City Analysis/Comparison

Los Angeles vs San Francisco

Side-by-side rent vs buy analysis comparing these two markets

Overall Comparison

Los Angeles has an edge

Los Angeles currently favors renting, with better rent-to-price dynamics.

Los Angeles, CA
🔑RENT

100% confidence

Median Home PriceBETTER

$859,957.76

Median RentBETTER

$2,809.35/mo

Price-to-Rent RatioBETTER

25.5

Property Tax RateTIE

0.73%

Price Change (1Y)

-1.8%

Price Change (5Y)

-9.2%

Break-Even YearsTIE

N/A

10-Year Wealth DifferenceBETTER

$597,809

San Francisco, CA
🔑RENT

100% confidence

Median Home Price

$1,245,307.09

Median Rent

$3,679.66/mo

Price-to-Rent Ratio

28.2

Property Tax RateTIE

0.73%

Price Change (1Y)BETTER

+0.9%

Price Change (5Y)BETTER

+4.6%

Break-Even YearsTIE

N/A

10-Year Wealth Difference

$1,043,177

Key Differences

Home Prices

Los Angeles's median home price of $859,957.76 is lower than San Francisco's $1,245,307.09 by 31%.

Monthly Rent

Renting in Los Angeles costs $2,809.35/mo compared to $3,679.66/mo in San Francisco—a difference of $870.31/mo.

Buy vs Rent Verdict

Both cities currently favor renting.

Break-Even Timeline

Break-even analysis varies based on market conditions in each city.

Run Your Own Numbers

This comparison uses median values. Your income, savings, and goals matter. Use our Buy vs Rent calculator to get a personalized analysis.

Explore More Cities