RentalCalcs
ToolsMarket MapMy DealsPricingBlog
RentalCalcs

Professional real estate investment calculators to help you analyze deals faster and make confident investment decisions.

Product

  • Tools
  • Market Map
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • About

Top Markets

  • Maricopa County, AZ
  • Harris County, TX
  • San Diego County, CA
  • Miami-Dade County, FL
  • Dallas County, TX
  • Clark County, NV
  • Cook County, IL
  • Tarrant County, TX
  • Wayne County, MI
  • Orange County, CA
  • Browse All Markets →

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

© 2026 RentalCalcs. All rights reserved.

Market MapOhioStark

Stark County

OhioPopulation: 374,199
68
/100
Hold
#145 of 1,000 counties
#40 in Ohio (88 counties)
Analysis by RentalCalcs Research·Independent data + algorithm-driven scoring
Updated May 15, 2026Sources: Zillow ZHVI, Zillow ZORI, US Census ACS, Tax Foundation

Market Snapshot

$211,655
Median Home Price
9% below national median
$1,062/mo
Median Rent
30% below national median
6.02%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Top 49% nationally
-$420
Est. Monthly Cash Flow
With 20% down at 6.9% rate

Stark market analysis

Stark County sits at a gross rent-to-price ratio of 6.02% on a $211,655 median home price against $1,062 in median rent. The model cap rate comes in at 3.91%, which places this market firmly in appreciation-leaning territory rather than cash-flow territory. At a 6.85% mortgage rate with 20% down, the model underwrite produces negative $420 per month in cash flow and a cash-on-cash return of negative 10.35%. Those numbers are not subtle. The 4.35% year-over-year price appreciation is real and scores an 84 on the appreciation index, which is the highest individual score in the county's profile and explains where the investment thesis actually lives. Stability scores a 50, which warrants attention from anyone expecting smooth sailing.

This market suits an appreciation buyer or a patient value-add operator far more than a cash-flow buyer running standard leverage at current rates. The cash-flow score of 60 out of 100 reflects a market that can produce income under the right conditions, but not at the median price point with today's financing. A buyer who can negotiate below median, bring more equity, or convert a distressed asset at a lower basis has a better shot at threading the needle. The affordability index of 80 and median household income of $63,130 suggest there is genuine renter demand from working households who cannot buy at current rates, which supports occupancy for operators who price correctly. But anyone penciling a deal at $211,655 with conventional financing needs to underwrite the negative carry explicitly and have a clear thesis for how price appreciation or rent growth closes the gap over a defined hold period.

The $316 per month in combined property tax and insurance deserves a dedicated line on your underwrite. At a state-average effective rate of 1.56%, Ohio's property tax burden is high enough to move deals from marginal to underwater, and it is already baked into the estimated expenses figure. That monthly number represents $275 per month in tax alone on the median-priced asset. The state-average rate is the figure on file here, and county and township rates in Ohio vary enough that you should pull the actual parcel-level tax bill before you close, not after. The insurance rate of 0.23% is relatively contained and is not the driver of cost pressure here. Tax is.

The stability score of 50 is the most important risk signal in this data set. It does not point to a specific cause, but a mid-sized Midwestern county at 374,199 people with no economic anchor data on file warrants independent due diligence on employer concentration and population trend. Markets at this population size in Ohio can carry meaningful exposure to a single large employer or a declining industrial base. Before committing capital, verify the current composition of the local job market and whether any major employers have announced expansions or contractions. Demographic drift in smaller Midwestern metros can suppress rent growth even when headline prices are rising, since price appreciation in lower-cost markets is often driven more by investor and owner-occupant demand than by income growth.

Among the five neighboring counties in the comparison set, Stark's 6.02% rent-to-price ratio is the second lowest, sitting just above Richland County at 5.99%. Richland prices in at $187,141 with only $935 in median rent, so the absolute rent level is lower even though the ratio is similar. Hancock County posts the most attractive rent-to-price ratio at 6.85% on a $229,447 median, which means it is likely generating better cash-flow math at the same leverage assumptions. Lorain and Medina counties carry higher price points ($249,898 and $333,151) with ratios of 6.34% and 6.46% respectively, putting them in the appreciation-leaning camp as well but at significantly higher entry cost. Greene County at 6.75% and $289,519 median splits the difference. All five neighbors carry an overall score of 68, identical to Stark's 68, which means the differentiation comes down to price point, rent level, and what you believe about local growth. Choose Stark over its neighbors when your thesis is lower entry price combined with appreciation upside and you are willing to accept negative carry in the near term, or when you identify a specific asset trading at enough discount to the median to generate neutral or positive cash flow. If cash flow is the primary mandate, Hancock County's 6.85% ratio at a reasonable absolute price point warrants a closer look before committing to Stark.

Last analyzed May 15, 2026. Based on the latest available Zillow and Census data for Stark County.

Scenario comparison

Same $1,062/mo rent assumption, 20% down, 6.85% rate. What changes is the acquisition price.
ScenarioPurchase priceMonthly cash flowCap rateCash-on-cash
75% of median
value-add or distressed
$158,741-$142/mo5.2%-4.7%
Median
typical MLS deal
$211,655-$420/mo3.9%-10.3%
125% of median
newer / premium
$264,569-$697/mo3.1%-13.8%

Price History

Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI

Quick Investment Calculator

20%
5%50%100%

Purchase

Purchase Price$211,655
Down Payment (20%)$42,331
Loan Amount$169,324
Interest Rate6.85%

Monthly Cash Flow

Gross Rent+$1,062
Monthly P&I-$1,110
Est. Expenses (35%)-$372
Net Cash Flow-$420/mo
3.9%
Cap Rate (all cash)
-10.3%
Cash-on-Cash Return
6.02%
Rent-to-Price Ratio
Negative leverage: At 6.85% rates, borrowing costs exceed the 3.9% cap rate. All-cash buyers may see better returns.

* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.

Run Full AnalysisTry House Hack Strategy

Score Breakdown

Overall Investment Score
68/100
68
Cash Flow(30%)
60/100

Based on 6.02% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.

Appreciation(25%)
84/100

Based on 4.3% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.

Stability(25%)
50/100

Population data not available.

Affordability(20%)
80/100

Price-to-income ratio of 3.4x. Lower ratios indicate more affordable markets.

Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.

Investment Outlook

Strengths

  • +Affordable relative to local incomes
  • +Complete rent data available

Challenges

  • -Negative cash flow at typical financing (-$420/mo)
  • -Negative leverage (cap rate 3.9% < mortgage rate 6.9%)

Economic Indicators

Population
374,199
Median Income
$63,130
vs $57,059 national est.
Unemployment Rate
—
Data pending
Price-to-Income
3.4x
Moderately affordable

Who this market fits

Best for
  • +Patient holders willing to accept negative carry for equity gains
  • +All-cash buyers: removing debt service flips the cap rate to actual yield
Skip if
  • −You need positive cash flow on day one at typical leverage
  • −You can't tolerate negative leverage (cap rate below mortgage rate today)

Compare to Nearby Counties

CountyVerdict
RichlandOH
69$187,141$9356.00%BuyView
CurrentStarkOH
68$211,655$1,0626.02%Buy
HancockOH
68$229,447$1,3106.85%BuyView
LorainOH
68$249,898$1,3206.34%BuyView
MedinaOH
68$333,151$1,7926.46%BuyView
GreeneOH
68$289,519$1,6286.75%BuyView

The Bottom Line

HoldStark scores well overall, but a typical leveraged buy-and-hold loses $420/mo at current rates. Consider house hacking, value-add, or all-cash; otherwise a worse score with positive cash flow may be the better deal.

Stark County in Ohio scores 68/100, ranking #145 of 1,000 US counties (top 19%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $420/month; the 6.02% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.

Monthly Cash Flow
$-420/mo
Cap Rate
3.9%
Cash-on-Cash
-10.3%

Related markets

Markets like Stark with stronger cash flow

  • Hancock County for cash-flow rentals
  • Greene County for cash-flow rentals
  • Medina County for cash-flow rentals

Cheaper alternatives to Stark

  • Richland County, lower entry price

Head-to-head comparisons

  • Stark vs Hancock for rentals
  • Stark vs Lorain for rentals
  • Stark vs Medina for rentals
All counties in Ohio →

Frequently asked questions

The average cap rate in Stark County is 3.91%, which is relatively modest and indicates this market favors long-term appreciation over immediate cash flow. This rate reflects the county's higher appreciation potential (84 out of 100 score) compared to its cash-flow economics.

Ready to Analyze a Deal in Stark?

Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.

Single Family1-4 unit rentals, BRRRRHouse HackOwner-occupied strategyMultifamily5+ unit properties
Explore Other Markets