Mohave County sits at a 3.31% cap rate on a $350,643 median purchase price, with gross rent of $1,489 per month producing a rent-to-price ratio of 0.051. That puts it squarely in appreciation territory rather than cash-flow country. The model underwrite, at 6.85% interest on an 80% loan, produces a monthly mortgage of $1,838 against $1,489 in rent before any expenses, and the resulting cash-on-cash return of -12.95% confirms this is not a market where you buy at the median and clip coupons. Year-over-year price growth of 1.18% is modest, not the kind of appreciation that rescues negative carry quickly. The affordability index of 35 and median household income of $53,592 also tell you that organic rent-growth pressure is constrained by what local tenants can actually pay.
This market does not suit a cash-flow buyer who is financing at current rates. The numbers simply don't support it at median price points. It fits the appreciation buyer with a longer hold thesis, or, more realistically, the operator who can source below-market acquisitions, whether through distress, off-market relationships, or value-add repositioning, and close the gap between that -$870 monthly cash flow and breakeven. With a population of 214,229 and an affordability index of 35, there is a tenant base that cannot afford to own, which supports rental demand in principle, but capturing it profitably requires buying well below $350,000 or achieving rents above the $1,489 median. The appreciation score of 62 is the one bright spot, ranking relatively well within its peer set, but investors should pressure-test whether that reflects fundamental demand or prior-cycle momentum that has largely exhausted itself at 1.18% trailing growth.
The county's property tax burden is a genuine tailwind in the underwrite. Arizona's state-average effective rate runs 0.62%, flagged as low relative to national norms, which translates to $2,174 in annual taxes on the median asset. Combined with $806 in estimated annual insurance, the total tax-and-insurance carry is $248 per month. That is a materially lighter fixed cost than you'd face in Illinois, Texas, or New Jersey at comparable price points, and it explains roughly a third of why the gross cash-flow picture isn't worse. That said, this is a state-average estimate and actual Mohave County or township-level assessments may differ, so pull the specific parcel tax history before signing any purchase contract.
The primary risk here is concentration. Mohave County's largest population centers, Kingman, Lake Havasu City, and Bullhead City, are retirement and leisure-oriented markets with limited economic diversification. A county of 214,000 people with a $53,592 median income is not generating large-employer anchor demand of the kind that drives rental absorption in metro markets. Retiree in-migration has supported values historically, but that cohort is more likely to own than rent, and it is rate-sensitive as buyers, meaning the 1.18% price growth figure may be telling you that migration-driven appreciation has slowed. There is no vacancy data provided here, but thin economic diversification in a tertiary leisure market is a structural risk worth pricing into your underwriting assumptions rather than assuming it away.
Against its neighbors, Mohave is the weakest pure cash-flow option of the group. Navajo County at a 0.0604 rent-to-price ratio and Pinal County at 0.0609 both produce meaningfully better gross yields than Mohave's 0.051, and both carry overall scores of 49 and 50 respectively against Mohave's 49. Pima County, home to Tucson, is actually cheaper at $339,306 median with a 0.0534 ratio, offering modestly better yield plus the demand depth of a university and metro labor market. La Paz County scores a 55 overall, the strongest in this peer group, and at a $264,493 median price provides the lowest absolute capital commitment. The clearest case for choosing Mohave over these alternatives is if you have specific local knowledge, an off-market pipeline, or a value-add project in a Mohave submarket where you can buy at a discount large enough to close the yield gap. Buying at the median here, compared to Navajo or Pinal on raw yield metrics, requires a conviction on Mohave-specific appreciation or a deal-sourcing edge that the aggregate numbers don't yet justify.
| Scenario | Purchase price | Monthly cash flow | Cap rate | Cash-on-cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75% of median value-add or distressed | $262,982 | -$411/mo | 4.4% | -8.2% |
Median typical MLS deal | $350,643 | -$870/mo | 3.3% | -12.9% |
125% of median newer / premium | $438,304 | -$1,330/mo | 2.6% | -15.8% |
Historical data from Zillow ZHVI/ZORI
* Based on county median values. 35% expenses include taxes, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and property management. Actual results vary by property.
Based on 5.10% rent-to-price ratio. Higher ratios indicate stronger cash flow potential.
Based on 1.2% YoY price growth. Moderate growth (3-8%) scores highest.
Population data not available.
Price-to-income ratio of 6.5x. Lower ratios indicate more affordable markets.
Scores are calculated using real Zillow home value and rent data, Census population data, and economic indicators. The weighted average produces the overall investment score. Markets with missing rent data use estimated values based on regional averages.
Mohave County in Arizona scores 49/100, ranking #568 of 1,000 US counties (top 75%). At 20% down and current rates, a median-priced rental loses about $870/month; the 5.10% gross rent-to-price ratio doesn't survive debt service. The thesis here is appreciation, value-add, house hacking, or all-cash.
Use our investment calculators to run detailed numbers on specific properties.